This is an absurd and meaningless concept. The proper framework for discussion is the right to self-determination, which is denied to the Palestinians by Israel and not vice-versa. Are you ever going to stop spreading your lies and propaganda? What do you get put of advocating for terrorism? Yes, we are all well aware that some people, like yourself, reject the right of self-determination for the Palestinians altogether.
I have deleted a number of your posts. Please do not paste entire articles without links. You are welcome to share links to articles to support your arguments, but please keep your comments relevant to the article. Who has Jordan? Not the Palestinians. And why would they want Jordan? Palestine is their home. Are you suggesting Palestinians take over a different country and expell them as Israel did to Palestinians?
The fact is Jordan, Israel, Palestine and Syria and are the same country. With artificial borders. The people of Israel want Israel to exist. Therefore it should. So you may not be denying it but you sure as fuck want to. I agree Anglos living in Oklahoma and Ohio and Arizona and Nebraska need to leave as well, you nazi lol.
A key element of Arab and anti-Zionist attacks on Israel is the notion that the Jewish presence in the country is a remnant of 19th century imperialism in which Europeans colonized and exploited parts of the third world. But far from being outsiders there, the Jewish ties date back 4, years to the very beginning of Jewish history recounted in the Bible and verified by much of the evidence of archeology that has been discovered.
Though the Romans expelled most of the Jewish population from the country, Jewish settlement continued without interruption throughout the last 2, years. In all this time, the Land of Israel remained a constant in thoughts and the hearts of Jews throughout the world, as it was remembered in their daily prayers and in their dreams. Though both Christianity and Islam have holy sites in the city, the Jewish ties predate that of any other existing religion. King David made Jerusalem the capital of Israel 3, years ago — 1, years before Islam was even founded.
Jerusalem never served as even a provincial capital during the centuries of Muslim rule. The entire city is sacred to Jews; only the Dome of the Rock has religious significance to Muslims. Moreover, in the modern era, Jews have been the majority of the population of the city since the s. As for freedom of worship, the only period during which all faiths have been free to worship in peace has been since when the city became unified under Israeli sovereignty.
From the very start of the Jewish return to their historic homeland in the late 19th century, it has never been the goal of the Zionist movement to uproot the Arab population or to create a state where only Jews could live.
- Visual Mathematics and Cyberlearning.
- Community Punishment: European perspectives;
- Multidimensional Analysis: Algebras and Systems for Science and Engineering?
- Reincarnation and the Law of Karma?
- Top Ten Myths about the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.
- Energy Policies of Iea Countriesl Finland 2003 Review?
- Israelism Arab Scholarship Israel Critical by Hassan Barari.
Dating back to the s, every subsequent peace plan that has been proposed involved some sort of partition of the Western portion of Palestine. Though all of these schemes involved painful concessions for the Jews, the leadership of the Zionist movement and subsequently the Jewish state always accepted this principle of sharing the country. In , the United Nations approved the partition of Palestine between a Jewish state and an Arab state.
The response of the Palestinian Arabs, as well as the rest of the Arab and Muslim world, was a categorical rejection of any scheme that allowed a Jewish state on any part of the land, no matter what its borders might be. No effort was made to set up an independent Arab state in the part of Palestine allotted for that purpose. But for the next 19 years when these territories remained under Arab control, there was never any consideration given to creating an Arab state there.
On the contrary, the focus of the Arab world was on extinguishing the fledgling state of Israel that existed in the truncated borders left by the armistice lines. Myth 5: The plight of Palestinian refugees is a special case of dispossession that must be redressed by international action.
The Palestinian refugees, whose exit from the country was caused more by a general fear of the war sweeping over the land than by any action on the part of the Israelis, were the only refugees who were kept in camps and not allowed to integrate into the populations of the Arab countries that received them. They were kept homeless as a means of maintaining the illusion that the creation of Israel could be undone. Subsequent generations of this population have been raised in these camps and inculcated in an irredentist ideology whose premise is the rejection of any Jewish state.
They remain the wards of a UN agency the United Nations Relief Works Agency that is devoted to perpetuating their status as refugees at a cost of billions of dolllars on international aid. On the other hand, several hundred thousand Jews living in Arab countries were evicted from their homes during this same era and forced to flee to safety in Israel or the West — where they were integrated into society. Egypt demanded, and got, the UN peacekeeping force that separated their army from Israel in the Sinai, to withdraw. When international diplomacy failed to get the Arabs to back down, Israel decided that it would not wait to be attacked and launched a defensive war to forestall the Arab assault.
No peace. No recognition. No negotiations. Though many legal sources claim that Jewish settlements in the West Bank are illegal, the fact remains that the right of Jewish settlement in those lands was guaranteed by the Mandate for Palestine of the League of Nations. This territory was never part of any other sovereign state and its final legal status is subject to negotiations that must be concluded between the competing parties. Until such time as there is a peace accord which gives one side or the other sovereignty in this territory, it is inaccurate to refer to this land as belonging to one side or another.
Twice before, Israel has shown a willingness to uproot Jewish communities for the sake of peace: in the Sinai given back to Egypt in the Peace Treaty and in Gaza from which Israel withdrew unilaterally in The existence of settlements in these areas is no bar to a peace deal under which they might be withdrawn.
Myth 8: The failure of the Oslo peace process was the result of actions by hard-line Israeli governments. The Oslo process was embraced by Israel in the hope that an offer of land would be met with genuine peace.
Top Ten Myths about the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
However, the result of years of negotiations and various Israeli withdrawals has not been peace. Throughout the s as Israel signed several agreements that gave the Palestinians more autonomy, the corrupt PA leadership continued to tolerate and even fund terror groups. Though all Israeli governments have, at times, been forced to reply with force to terrorist attacks from Gaza, Lebanon and the West Bank, all have stated a willingness to negotiate a peace.
Today the Palestinians are split between the Palestinian Authority led by Mahmoud Abbas which is too weak to make peace and Hamas, the rulers of Gaza, who reject it under any circumstances. Both factions reject the legitimacy of a Jewish state. The rivalry between the two great Muslim religious strains, Shia and Sunni, has been the source of more wars and more bloodshed than any battle between Arabs and Jews.
Similarly, the tensions between Persians modern day Iran with its Islamist rulers and nuclear ambitions and Arabs is another perennial conflict that predates the renewal of Jewish sovereignty in the region. Even more to the point, the conflict between radical Islamists who seek to impose their religious and political views on the rest of the Muslim world, and those who oppose them in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, has nothing to do with Israel or the Palestinians.
It is this schism which is at the core of the rise of Al Qaeda and the Taliban.
- Analysis of concrete structures by fracture mechanics: proceedings of the International RILEM workshop, Abisko, Sweden, June 28-30, 1989.
- Classical macroeconomics;
- Arab scholars on Israel are lacking, academic says?
- Israelism : Arab scholarship on Israel, a critical assessment.
- Emerging Trends in Image Processing, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition;
The clash of civilizations between Islam and the West was the cause of wars between European nations and Muslim countries for centuries with no Jewish involvement. Linking world peace to a resolution of the Palestinian conflict is just another tactic of rejectionist groups bent on perpetuating the conflict and diverting attention from the real issues.
Myth American support for Israel is the result of the manipulations of the U. Support for the return of the Jews to their ancient homeland dates back to the very beginning of American history. Sympathy for the idea of a renewed Jewish state is rooted in the faith of most Americans, as well as in their belief that the persecuted Jewish people were entitled to find a new life in their old home.
From the very beginnings of the Zionist movement, it found both a welcome and support from large numbers of Americans. In the aftermath of the Holocaust that support became even greater. Today, the overwhelming majority of Americans of all faiths and both major political parties see Israel as a friend and an ally. They need no prodding from a Jewish lobby to understand that the alliance with the Jewish state is based on common values and a shared belief in democracy.
You are not the author of this list. My response follows:. Strawman fallacy.
Hassan Barari - Google Scholar Citations
Nobody denies the historic connection. Bottom line: That historic connection does not give the Jews any legal right to the land, nor does it justify their crimes against the Palestinians, their ethnic cleansing of Palestine, and their theft of Arab lands. Nobody argues this.
Bottom line: The Israeli annexation of Jerusalem is illegal under international law. Most of the Zionist leadership rejected partition.